Regis College is accredited by the New England Commission of Higher Education (NECHE). Accreditation of an institution of higher education by the Commission indicates that it meets or exceeds criteria for the assessment of institutional quality periodically applied though a peer review process.

Regis last engaged in the full self-study process for accreditation in 2013; it underwent its five-year review in 2018. In August 2023, Regis will submit its 10-year self-study to the Commission in preparation for an October 2023 site visit. As part of the 10-year self-study process, faculty and staff are leading committees for each of the nine standards required for our Self Study.

In order to gain a broad perspective on Regis’s standing relative to each standard, and as part of the self-study process, we are asking for online feedback from the Regis community related to each standard and the work of the committees thus far. The university will also offer in-person/Zoom forums at a later date to facilitate structured conversations about Regis’s self-study as this process continues.

Below are the descriptions for each NECHE accreditation standard taken directly from their website. Please read the description for each standard and complete the feedback form related to that standard. You are welcome to provide feedback on as many standards as you would like, and responses are anonymous.

Please note that this process is being completed in relation to the Strategic Planning effort, and that the self-study narrative will be reviewed and approved by President Antoinette Hays, PhD, RN and her Cabinet prior to the submission of the final narrative. The information you are asked to review, and the information you provide, is preliminary, not final.

If you have any questions about the NECHE self-study, please reach out to Dr. Kate Edney, Associate Provost of Assessment, Accreditation, and Research, who is leading the Steering Committee as part of this process:

Your feedback is integral to this process and we welcome your insights using the links below.

  • Standard 1: Mission and Purposes

    The institution’s mission and purposes are appropriate to higher education, consistent with its charter or other operating authority, and implemented in a manner that complies with the Standards of the Commission on Institutions of Higher Education. The institution’s mission gives direction to its activities and provides a basis for the assessment and enhancement of the institution’s effectiveness.

    Standard 1 Feedback Form

  • Standard 2: Planning and Evaluation

    The institution undertakes planning and evaluation to accomplish and improve the achievement of its mission and purposes. It identifies its planning and evaluation priorities and pursues them effectively. The institution demonstrates its success in strategic, academic, financial, and other resource planning and the evaluation of its educational effectiveness.

    Standard 2 Feedback Form

  • Standard 3: Organization and Governance

    The institution has a system of governance that facilitates the accomplishment of its mission and purposes and supports institutional effectiveness and integrity. Through its organizational design and governance structure, the institution creates and sustains an environment that encourages teaching, learning, service, scholarship, and where appropriate, research and creative activity. It demonstrates administrative capacity by assuring provision of support adequate for the appropriate functioning of each organizational component. The institution has sufficient autonomy and control of its programs and operations consistent with its mission to be held directly accountable for meeting the Commission’s Standards for Accreditation.

    Standard 3 Feedback Form

  • Standard 4: The Academic Program

    The institution’s academic programs are consistent with and serve to fulfill its mission and purposes. The institution works systematically and effectively to plan, provide, oversee, evaluate, improve, and assure the academic quality and integrity of its academic programs and the credits and degrees awarded. The institution sets a standard of student achievement appropriate to the degree or certificate awarded and develops the systematic means to understand how and what students are learning and to use the evidence obtained to improve the academic program.

    Standard 4 Feedback Form

  • Standard 5: Students

    Consistent with its mission, the institution sets and achieves realistic goals to enroll students who are broadly representative of the population the institution wishes to serve. The institution addresses its own goals for the achievement of diversity, equity, and inclusion among its students and provides a safe environment that fosters the intellectual and personal development of its students. It endeavors to ensure the success of its students, offering the resources and services that provide them the opportunity to achieve the goals of their educational program as specified in institutional publications. The institution’s interactions with students and prospective students are characterized by integrity and equity.

    Standard 5 Feedback Form

  • Standard 6: Teaching, Learning, and Scholarship

    The institution supports teaching and learning through a well-qualified faculty and academic staff, who, in structures and processes appropriate to the institution, collectively ensure the quality of instruction and support for student learning. Scholarship, research, and creative activities receive support appropriate to the institution’s mission. The institution’s faculty has primary responsibility for advancing the institution’s academic purposes through teaching, learning, and scholarship.

    Standard 6 Feedback Form

  • Standard 7: Institutional Resources

    The institution has sufficient human, financial, information, physical, and technological resources and capacity to support its mission. Through periodic evaluation, the institution demonstrates that its resources are sufficient to sustain the quality of its educational program and to support institutional improvement now and in the foreseeable future. The institution demonstrates, through verifiable internal and external evidence, its financial capacity to graduate its entering class. The institution administers its resources in an ethical manner and assures effective systems of enterprise risk management, regulatory compliance, internal controls, and contingency management.

    Standard 7 Feedback Form

  • Standard 8: Educational Effectiveness

    The institution demonstrates its effectiveness by ensuring satisfactory levels of student achievement on mission-appropriate student outcomes. Based on verifiable information, the institution understands what its students have gained as a result of their education and has useful evidence about the success of its recent graduates. This information is used for planning and improvement, resource allocation, and to inform the public about the institution Student achievement is at a level appropriate for the degree awarded.

    Standard 8 Feedback Form

  • Standard 9: Integrity, Transparency, and Public Disclosure

    The institution subscribes to and advocates high ethical standards in the management of its affairs and in its dealings with students, prospective students, faculty, staff, its governing board, external agencies and organizations, and the general public. Through its policies and practices, the institution endeavors to exemplify the values it articulates in its mission and related statements. In presenting the institution to students, prospective students, and other members of the public, the institutional website provides information, including information about student success, that is complete, accurate, timely, readily accessible, clear, and sufficient for intended audiences to make informed decisions about the institution.

    Standard 9 Feedback Form